0.08/0.14 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_vampire %s %d THM 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 1440 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 180 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 05:50:09 EDT 2024 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime : 0.14/0.38 This is a THF_ problem 0.14/0.38 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.14/0.39 Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire_ho --cores 7 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WyZLIfJ6Fh/E---3.1_11959.p -m 16384 -t 180 0.14/0.41 % (12219)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_11959 for (1799ds/4Mi) 0.14/0.41 % (12223)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_11959 for (1799ds/275Mi) 0.14/0.41 % (12224)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_11959 for (1799ds/18Mi) 0.14/0.41 % (12222)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_11959 for (1799ds/2Mi) 0.14/0.41 % (12222)Instruction limit reached! 0.14/0.41 % (12222)------------------------------ 0.14/0.41 % (12222)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200) 0.14/0.41 % (12221)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_11959 for (1799ds/2Mi) 0.14/0.41 % (12223)First to succeed. 0.14/0.41 % (12222)Termination reason: Unknown 0.14/0.41 % (12222)Termination phase: Saturation 0.14/0.41 0.14/0.41 % (12222)Memory used [KB]: 5500 0.14/0.41 % (12222)Time elapsed: 0.003 s 0.14/0.41 % (12222)Instructions burned: 2 (million) 0.14/0.41 % (12222)------------------------------ 0.14/0.41 % (12222)------------------------------ 0.14/0.41 % (12219)Also succeeded, but the first one will report. 0.14/0.41 % (12221)Also succeeded, but the first one will report. 0.14/0.41 % (12223)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya! 0.14/0.41 % SZS status Theorem for E---3.1_11959 0.14/0.41 % SZS output start Proof for E---3.1_11959 0.14/0.41 thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType). 0.14/0.41 thf(type_def_6, type, b: $tType). 0.14/0.41 thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType). 0.14/0.41 thf(func_def_1, type, b: $tType). 0.14/0.41 thf(func_def_2, type, r: a > b > $o). 0.14/0.41 thf(func_def_6, type, sK0: (a > b) > a). 0.14/0.41 thf(func_def_7, type, sK1: a > b). 0.14/0.41 thf(func_def_9, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)). 0.14/0.41 thf(f17,plain,( 0.14/0.41 $false), 0.14/0.41 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f16])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f16,plain,( 0.14/0.41 ($true != $true)), 0.14/0.41 inference(superposition,[],[f14,f15])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f15,plain,( 0.14/0.41 ( ! [X0 : a] : (((r @ X0 @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $true)) )), 0.14/0.41 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f13,plain,( 0.14/0.41 ! [X0 : a] : ((r @ X0 @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $true)), 0.14/0.41 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1])],[f6,f12])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f12,plain,( 0.14/0.41 ! [X0 : a] : (? [X1 : b] : ((r @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => ((r @ X0 @ (sK1 @ X0)) = $true))), 0.14/0.41 introduced(choice_axiom,[])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f6,plain,( 0.14/0.41 ! [X0 : a] : ? [X1 : b] : ((r @ X0 @ X1) = $true)), 0.14/0.41 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f5,plain,( 0.14/0.41 ! [X0 : a] : ? [X1 : b] : (r @ X0 @ X1)), 0.14/0.41 inference(rectify,[],[f1])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f1,axiom,( 0.14/0.41 ! [X0 : a] : ? [X1 : b] : (r @ X0 @ X1)), 0.14/0.41 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WyZLIfJ6Fh/E---3.1_11959.p',rtotal)). 0.14/0.41 thf(f14,plain,( 0.14/0.41 ( ! [X0 : a > b] : (((r @ (sK0 @ X0) @ (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) != $true)) )), 0.14/0.41 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f11,plain,( 0.14/0.41 ! [X0 : a > b] : ((r @ (sK0 @ X0) @ (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) != $true)), 0.14/0.41 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f9,f10])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f10,plain,( 0.14/0.41 ! [X0 : a > b] : (? [X1 : a] : ((r @ X1 @ (X0 @ X1)) != $true) => ((r @ (sK0 @ X0) @ (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) != $true))), 0.14/0.41 introduced(choice_axiom,[])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f9,plain,( 0.14/0.41 ! [X0 : a > b] : ? [X1 : a] : ((r @ X1 @ (X0 @ X1)) != $true)), 0.14/0.41 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f8,plain,( 0.14/0.41 ~? [X0 : a > b] : ! [X1 : a] : ((r @ X1 @ (X0 @ X1)) = $true)), 0.14/0.41 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f7,plain,( 0.14/0.41 ~? [X0 : a > b] : ! [X1 : a] : (r @ X1 @ (X0 @ X1))), 0.14/0.41 inference(rectify,[],[f3])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f3,negated_conjecture,( 0.14/0.41 ~? [X2 : a > b] : ! [X0 : a] : (r @ X0 @ (X2 @ X0))), 0.14/0.41 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2])). 0.14/0.41 thf(f2,conjecture,( 0.14/0.41 ? [X2 : a > b] : ! [X0 : a] : (r @ X0 @ (X2 @ X0))), 0.14/0.41 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.WyZLIfJ6Fh/E---3.1_11959.p',skolem)). 0.14/0.41 % SZS output end Proof for E---3.1_11959 0.14/0.41 % (12223)------------------------------ 0.14/0.41 % (12223)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200) 0.14/0.41 % (12223)Termination reason: Refutation 0.14/0.41 0.14/0.41 % (12223)Memory used [KB]: 5500 0.14/0.41 % (12223)Time elapsed: 0.004 s 0.14/0.41 % (12223)Instructions burned: 1 (million) 0.14/0.41 % (12223)------------------------------ 0.14/0.41 % (12223)------------------------------ 0.14/0.41 % (12217)Success in time 0.015 s 0.14/0.41 EOF